Originally posted by bhataktii rooh
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
ª!ª کیا کوئی میری مدد کرے گا ؟؟؟؟ ª!ª
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ummid View Postand sum up the question of the Prophet Altruck:
- quitting is not merely the absence of the act, but Turk is not intentional conduct, does not say (I left lunch), but that was in front of me and you do not eat, but if not originally placed in front of me I is not leaving him.
- mere act of evidence and did not say is in compliance with the already considered, if the aim of drawing closer was a delegate, otherwise it is permissible.
- Turk, as well as the abstract of the evidence and not on the order of leave did say, that afternoon the aim of drawing closer Del the hatred, and is not showing the aim of drawing closer to the Del license.
- also decided Dr. Abdullah Alagdia in (to facilitate the Islamic jurisprudence).
- for example, both appeared to leave the aim of drawing closer indicates that the example of hatred for women shake hands with men, the Prophet - may the blessings of God him and him - deliberately left in the position required and mustahabb be religiously permissible (allegiance), which indicates that Krahtha, because he was left devoid of evidence and to comply with the prohibition of my word.
and Allah knows best.
:shyy:
wese yaar such much mein translation ki hey???
lakin arabic words kam hein aap key eglish words kuch ziyada lag rehey hein....... REPUTATION try karti hoon chala tu theek warna sorry......sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by safia View Postarrayyy waah ummid kia baat hey........ aap ney tu arabi ko bhi nahi bakhsha ....... :lol
wese yaar such much mein translation ki hey???
lakin arabic words kam hein aap key eglish words kuch ziyada lag rehey hein....... REPUTATION try karti hoon chala tu theek warna sorry......
Comment
-
Originally posted by ummid View Postand sum up the question of the Prophet Altruck:
- quitting is not merely the absence of the act, but Turk is not intentional conduct, does not say (I left lunch), but that was in front of me and you do not eat, but if not originally placed in front of me I is not leaving him.
- mere act of evidence and did not say is in compliance with the already considered, if the aim of drawing closer was a delegate, otherwise it is permissible.
- Turk, as well as the abstract of the evidence and not on the order of leave did say, that afternoon the aim of drawing closer Del the hatred, and is not showing the aim of drawing closer to the Del license.
- also decided Dr. Abdullah Alagdia in (to facilitate the Islamic jurisprudence).
- for example, both appeared to leave the aim of drawing closer indicates that the example of hatred for women shake hands with men, the Prophet - may the blessings of God him and him - deliberately left in the position required and mustahabb be religiously permissible (allegiance), which indicates that Krahtha, because he was left devoid of evidence and to comply with the prohibition of my word.
and Allah knows best.
:shyy::thmbup:
Comment
-
Originally posted by safia View Postvery interesting english hey............. vese aabi jee yeh ghuttli siraf aamir hee suljha sakta hey..... vese agar aap kahin tu mein overall vo kia kahna chahta hey vo mein shayad describe kar jaon.....................:thmbup:
Comment
-
Originally posted by aabi2cool View Postbohat khooob munday to waqe ee fringi hi ab main is ka khuch hal karta hon kafi mushkil hal hui toon cheeta aien tay chah gaya aien tha kar k
Ager mujay tu pura reference deta to mein tujay terjmay ke saath saath terjmani bhi ker deta us paragraph ki.:thmbup:
Comment
Comment